This page allows you to view existing gaps and to find out which solutions could be addressing them. If you can't find the gap that you are looking for, you can define a new one: Add CM Gap.

PDF export


Underlätta matchning av CDM-lösningar efter kapacitetsbehov (DRIVER+)

  1. Gör det enklare att uttrycka  aktörers kapacitetsbehov och kapacitetsbrister.
  2. Underlätta förståelsen av dessa behov av lösningsägare så att de kan utveckla och tillkännage de innovativa lösningar som bildar slutlösningen.
  3. Gör det enklare att upptäcka de innovativa lösningar som tillgodoser -behoven och CDM-bristerna.

Cross-agency decision support tools (STAMINA)

Crisis management in the recent COVID-19 pandemics has been impeded by lack of coherence between decision making in different agencies and at different levels.


Skogsbränder: geografiska mönster och tidsmönster (DRMKC)

Hanteringsåtgärder och insättandet av resurser för att hindra bränder baseras på var och hur bränderna uppstår. Att känna till vad det är som gör ett område särskilt benäget för bränder eller inte är viktigt, inte bara för att bevara dess värden och resurser, men också för att förhindra att framtida hanteringsåtgärder, i synnerhet i områden där bränder ackumuleras, inte leder till ökad sårbarhet för skogsbränder.



Resursstyrning under långsiktiga krishanteringsinsatser (DRIVER+)

Brister vad beträffar resursstyrning (mänskliga resurser, maskinvara osv.) under långsiktiga krishanteringsinsatsermed flera berörda aktörer involverade.


Övervaka de fysiologiska tecknen hos blåljusaktörer (IFAFRI)

Förmågan att övervaka de fysiologiska tecknen hosblåljusaktörer


Realtidsdata och fusion av information till stöd för räddningsledarens beslutsfattande (DRIVER+)

Begränsningar i möjligheterna att i realtid slå samman och syntetisera spridda datakällor och datamodeller (historiska händelser, spridningsmodeller, taktisk situation, karta över kritiska stödresurser, osv.) till stöd för räddningsledarens beslutsfattande.


Adequate communication technology for crisis management (STAMINA)

Recent COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated that EU states have so far failed to endorse a solid pandemics/epidemics communication methodology, develop clear guidelines and enforce use of these guidelines in crisis situations.

As a result, the communication was often haphazard, with different organizations and authorities occasionally disagreeing in their assessments of the situation and recommendations. 



Contact tracing and backtracing (STAMINA)

Contact tracing (also known as partner notification) is a primary means of controlling infectious diseases such as tuberculosis (TB), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Contact tracing has also played an important role in controlling the COVID-19 spread. Backtracing is similar to contact tracing, but concentrates on tracing back the movements of infected persons. Similar functionality may be required in other types of crisis, e.g. 

Tools to gather and analyze the gathered information (INEGMA-E²)

The evaluator has to gather a lot of information, later analyse it and produce (first impression) reports, which is a difficult task that could be made easier by using modern tools such as applications on a phone or a tablet.

Evaluation of Project Management During the Project Cycle of the Exercise (INEGMA-E²)

The evaluation of an EU-funded civil protection exercise is not limited to the evaluation of the exercise itself but regularly also to the entire project cycle. This includes the formative evaluation of the phases of exercise planning and exercise preparation in order to be able to identify fields of improvement already in an early phase of the project.

Possibility of access to the entire information exchange (INEGMA-E²)

For proper evaluation on has to understand what is going on and be able to follow the process (and changes of the processes) -> e.g. critical points in pathways (why is this and this – not – happening > because something was being brought into perspective)

Fully understanding of the evaluators role for the participants (INEGMA-E²)

Sometimes evaluators are perceived as a kind of an "enemy" (might be a strogn word), as they are looking on what participants are doing = stressfull, feeling of being controlled, being observed. It needs to be understood, that the role is not to judge/classify the participants, but to contribute to the improvement.

It is a lot about transparency! If it is clear: methodology to evaluate the teams. It cannot be assumed that every team understands the methodology. If there is a common way to evaluate exercises, it becomes more clear. A kind of standard-evaluation.

eu Portfolio of Solutions web site has been initially developed in the scope of DRIVER+ project. Today, the service is managed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH., for the benefit of the European Crisis Management. PoS is endorsed and supported by the Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) as well as by the STAMINA and TeamAware H2020 projects.