Faciliter la correspondance des solutions de gestion des crises et des catastrophes aux besoins capacitaires (DRIVER+)
- Faciliter l'expression des besoins et lacunes des intervenants en termes de capacités.
- Faciliter la compréhension de ces besoins par les propriétaires de pour qu'ils puissent développer et promouvoir les solutions innovantes pour y remédier.
- Faciliter la découverte de solutions innovantes pour répondre aux besoins et lacunes en termes de et des catastrophes.
Cross-agency decision support tools (STAMINA)
Crisis management in the recent COVID-19 pandemics has been impeded by lack of coherence between decision making in different agencies and at different levels.
Feux de forêt : modèles spatiaux et temporels des incendies (DRMKC)
Les mesures de gestion et de déploiement des ressources pour prévenir les feux dépendent de l'endroit et de la manière du déclenchement des incendies. La compréhension de ce qui rend une zone particulièrement susceptible de brûler ou non est non seulement importante pour conserver ses valeurs et ressources, mais aussi pour empêcher que les mesures de gestion futures, en particulier dans les zones où les incendies s'accumulent, ne donnent pas lieu à une vulnérabilité accrue aux feux de forêt.
Gestion des ressources pendant des opérations d'intervention sur le long terme (DRIVER+)
Lacunes en termes de gestion des ressources (ressources humaines, matérielles, etc.) pendant des opérations d'intervention de parties prenantes multiples sur le long terme.
Surveiller les symptômes physiologiques des intervenants d'urgence (IFAFRI)
La à surveiller les symptômes physiologiques des intervenants d'
Données en temps réel et fusionnement des informations pour soutenir la prise de décision du commandant de l'incident (DRIVER+)
limitée à fusionner et synthétiser des modèles et sources de données disparates en temps réel (événements historiques, modèles de propagation, situation tactique, carte des actifs critiques, etc.) pour soutenir la prise de décision du commandant de l'incident.
Adequate communication technology for crisis management (STAMINA)
Recent COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated that EU states have so far failed to endorse a solid pandemics/epidemics communication methodology, develop clear guidelines and enforce use of these guidelines in crisis situations.
As a result, the communication was often haphazard, with different organizations and authorities occasionally disagreeing in their assessments of the situation and recommendations.
Contact tracing and backtracing (STAMINA)
Contact tracing (also known as partner notification) is a primary means of controlling infectious diseases such as tuberculosis (TB), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Contact tracing has also played an important role in controlling the COVID-19 spread. Backtracing is similar to contact tracing, but concentrates on tracing back the movements of infected persons. Similar functionality may be required in other types of crisis, e.g.
Tools to gather and analyze the gathered information (INEGMA-E²)
The evaluator has to gather a lot of information, later analyse it and produce (first impression) reports, which is a difficult task that could be made easier by using modern tools such as applications on a phone or a tablet.
Evaluation of Project Management During the Project Cycle of the Exercise (INEGMA-E²)
The evaluation of an EU-funded civil protection exercise is not limited to the evaluation of the exercise itself but regularly also to the entire project cycle. This includes the formative evaluation of the phases of exercise planning and exercise preparation in order to be able to identify fields of improvement already in an early phase of the project.
Possibility of access to the entire information exchange (INEGMA-E²)
For proper evaluation on has to understand what is going on and be able to follow the process (and changes of the processes) -> e.g. critical points in pathways (why is this and this – not – happening > because something was being brought into perspective)
Fully understanding of the evaluators role for the participants (INEGMA-E²)
Sometimes evaluators are perceived as a kind of an "enemy" (might be a strogn word), as they are looking on what participants are doing = stressfull, feeling of being controlled, being observed. It needs to be understood, that the role is not to judge/classify the participants, but to contribute to the improvement.
It is a lot about transparency! If it is clear: methodology to evaluate the teams. It cannot be assumed that every team understands the methodology. If there is a common way to evaluate exercises, it becomes more clear. A kind of standard-evaluation.
![]() |
Le site web Portfolio of Solutions a été initialement développé dans le cadre du projet DRIVER+. Aujourd'hui, le service est géré par AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, au profit de l'European Crisis Management. Le PoS est approuvé et soutenu par le Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) ainsi que par les projets STAMINA et TeamAware H2020. |