Permitir que las soluciones de gestión de crisis y catástrofes se adapten a las competencias necesarias (DRIVER+)
- Facilitar la expresión de las capacidades necesarias y las carencias de de los profesionales de gestión de la . Facilitar el conocimiento de estas necesidades por los propietarios de soluciones, de forma que puedan desarrollar y anunciar soluciones innovadoras que resuelvan dichas carencias. Facilitar el descubrimiento de las soluciones innovadoras que abordan las necesidades y las carencias en materia de y catástrofes.
Detección, supervisión y análisis en tiempo real de amenazas y peligros (IFAFRI)
La de detectar, supervisar y analizar en tiempo real las amenazas y los peligros pasivos y activos en el lugar del incidente
Incendios forestales: patrones espaciales y temporales de los incendios (DRMKC)
Las medidas de gestión y el despliegue de recursos contraincendios se basan en dónde y cómo tienen lugar los incendios. Para conservar los valores y los recursos de una zona, así como para evitar que las medidas de gestión futuras (especialmente en aquellas zonas en las que se acumulan los incendios) no den lugar a una mayor vulnerabilidad frente a incendios incontrolados, es importante comprender por qué esa zona es especialmente propensa a sufrir incendios.
Secure cross-agency documentation, sharing and tracking (STAMINA)
Efficient and secure sharing of the data necessary for decision making has proven to be challenging in the recent COVID-19 .
Adequate collaboration and communication guidelines and methodology (STAMINA)
management is a collective effort encompassing various organisations that need to work seamlessly together across domain and administrative borders.
Modelar y visualizar la dinámica de las amenazas químicas y radiactivas (DRIVER+)
Limitaciones en la de modelar en tiempo real (fase de ) o de forma previa al suceso (fase de ) la dinámica de la amenaza química y radiactiva y visualizar los resultados obtenidos en un formato que pueda ser usado directamente por el jefe de operaciones del incidente.
Adequate communication technology for crisis management (STAMINA)
Recent COVID-19 has demonstrated that EU states have so far failed to endorse a solid pandemics/epidemics communication methodology, develop clear guidelines and enforce use of these guidelines in crisis situations.
As a result, the communication was often haphazard, with different organizations and authorities occasionally disagreeing in their assessments of the situation and recommendations.
Contact tracing and backtracing (STAMINA)
Contact tracing (also known as partner notification) is a primary means of controlling infectious diseases such as tuberculosis (TB), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Contact tracing has also played an important role in controlling the COVID-19 spread. Backtracing is similar to contact tracing, but concentrates on tracing back the movements of infected persons. Similar functionality may be required in other types of , e.g.
Tools to gather and analyze the gathered information (INEGMA-E²)
The evaluator has to gather a lot of information, later analyse it and produce (first impression) reports, which is a difficult task that could be made easier by using modern tools such as applications on a phone or a tablet.
Evaluation of Project Management During the Project Cycle of the Exercise (INEGMA-E²)
The evaluation of an EU-funded civil protection exercise is not limited to the evaluation of the exercise itself but regularly also to the entire project cycle. This includes the formative evaluation of the phases of exercise planning and exercise preparation in order to be able to identify fields of improvement already in an early phase of the project.
Possibility of access to the entire information exchange (INEGMA-E²)
For proper evaluation on has to understand what is going on and be able to follow the process (and changes of the processes) -> e.g. critical points in pathways (why is this and this – not – happening > because something was being brought into perspective)
Fully understanding of the evaluators role for the participants (INEGMA-E²)
Sometimes evaluators are perceived as a kind of an "enemy" (might be a strogn word), as they are looking on what participants are doing = stressfull, feeling of being controlled, being observed. It needs to be understood, that the role is not to judge/classify the participants, but to contribute to the improvement.
It is a lot about transparency! If it is clear: methodology to evaluate the teams. It cannot be assumed that every team understands the methodology. If there is a common way to evaluate exercises, it becomes more clear. A kind of standard-evaluation.
 |
El sitio web Portfolio of Solutions se desarrolló inicialmente en el marco del proyecto DRIVER+. En la actualidad, el servicio está gestionado por el AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, en beneficio de la gestión europea de . El PoS está avalado y apoyado por la Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA), así como por los proyectos STAMINA y TeamAware H2020. |