Attendance of participants at post event review

Endorsed by

Participants tend to lose interest in the , after having completed it. Depending on the expectations about the post-event outcomes (it is about findings, explaining to the people, is it about particular/specific processes/findings).

Opinion of the participants about the is an important part of the picture. It should be a composition of partial perspectives.

Potential Solutions
Following solutions could be addressing this gap.

Who are the "Participants"?
Feedback session of the people that have been trained. Trainer/coach/mentor: also observes things; maybe not the "whole" teams, but just team leaders.

Temporal dimension:
do the de-brief at least within 5 working days, level of satisfaction/engagement depends on preparation (even if just 1, 2 are not prepared)

Rationale & related CM function(s)

Why was the purpose (not) met; indicators for (not) success (e.g., poor preparation; unexpected characteristics of context/situation such as weather, covid: not enough participants, airport/traffic, etc.); role conflicts
eu Portfolio of Solutions web site has been initially developed in the scope of DRIVER+ project. Today, the service is managed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH., for the benefit of the European Management. PoS is endorsed and supported by the Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) as well as by the STAMINA and TeamAware H2020 projects.